From: teabowbraine. From: nibirushock. READ THIS! Lyndon LaRouche ‘Tragedy & Hope’ address in Washington DC on May 7, 2008. LaRouche talked about Obama getting the nomination and the evil mindset behind the “Lisbon Treaty” to create a British-European totalitarian superstate. The brilliant, but wicked and evil spirited occult New World Order masterplan is unfolding. The ultimate goal of globalization (or globalisation) through propaganda and rhetoric (War on Terror) and initiating chaos that eventually will lead to depopulation (genocide). Under the energy of Venus and the Sun, the occult NWO foundation masterplan must be realized by 2013. (that is, by Gregorian calendar date December 22, 2013 following another ritual circle around the Sun (starting in Solar Maximum year =2012) counting from December 22, 2012. (= end date of Mayan Long Count Calendar 13.00.00 Baktun). It takes 243 years for Venus to return to the exact point where it started. It’s called a Venus Round. And they (Illuminati), determined the creation of the NWO in 1770, with Rothschild and Adam Weishaupt as the real “founding fathers.” 1770 was the year in which a new cycle of 242 years started, sectioned in 99,11121,11 = 242 years! (=11×9, 99:9, 11×11, 121:11) (sequence= x9,:9,x11,:11 = ratio 9/11) Right now we are living in the ‘:11 stage’, meaning the LAST 11 years from SolarMax to SolarMax, starting from 2001 (WTC attack) to 2012. 11:11 as deceptive symbolism, means nothing more than the completion of …
Video Rating: 4 / 5

PLEASE RATE AND COMMENT. SPREAD THIS VID FAR AND WIDE! – WE NEED TO GET THE WORD OUT! New World Order On Trial Is the new world order real? You can bet your bottom dollar it is! We are literally just a few short years away from the completion of the plan to centralize global power to control the affairs of the whole planet, all from under one roof that is filled with unelected, totalitarian bureaucrats. What is wrong with that, you may rightfully ask? Well, on the face of it, a global government sounds like a reasonable idea. But it can ONLY work in the favor of the people of this planet if…and ONLY if… the people who control the new world order are nothing less than angels. If the person at the very top of new world order is God himself, and the government is comprised of God’s chosen angels, then I would be somewhat comfortable with that idea. But if the people who set up and run the new world order are comprised of liars and war profiteers then I don’t want to know. In fact I would go one step further and suggest that any global government that is run by human beings can only spell disaster for everyone else on the planet. Regardless of how well-meaning they are. When the world is controlled by one small group of people, all of your options are gone. If you don’t like what the New World Order is doing, you can’t vote them out. And emigrating to another country will be useless because the New World Order will control every country. You will therefore be trapped …
Video Rating: 4 / 5

http://www.privacyinternational.org/article.shtml?cmd%5B347%5D=x-347-559597#summary

Best answer:

Answer by werdo1998
You have committed a thought crime. You had better watch out.

Add your own answer in the comments!

“Gold is the canary in the financial coal mine.”

The gold & silver prices have broken out to new highs. Tremendous heights will be achieved. We will see $2000 gold, then later $3000 gold. We will see $40 silver, then later $70 silver. It is pre-ordained. It is written. It will be done. Nothing is fixed nor will be fixed. Much money has been wasted, and more will be wasted. Each round of economic stimulus pushes the gold & silver price higher. Each round of big bank bond redemption pushes the gold & silver price higher. Each round of sanctioned official debt monetization pushes the gold & silver price higher. Each round of inaction from political delay or stalemate pushes the gold & silver price higher. The only lack of satisfaction from the leaps higher in precious metal prices comes from knowing that the world as we know it will change, as the landscape shows evidence of economic scars. Supply chain disruption, price inflation, lost financial security, social unrest, and growing chaos will make it difficult to enjoy the strong purchasing power from a high gold & silver price from personal holdings in investment. But the alternative is so much worse than not holding them in investment. Gold & silver are a vote of no confidence in the paper system. Gold & silver are vast life boats during a tsunami. Gold & silver are a stake in the future. – Jim Willie.

Duration : 0:0:26

Chen Xuxing’s house is gone. A local real estate developer in Wuhan wanted to use his land to build a park, but Mr. Chen didn’t agree. So the company forced him out of him home—and then demolished it.

It’s known as forced eviction, and in China, it’s one of the most serious problems facing the country today. Developers, often working with local officials, have rushed to cash in on a real estate boom. Often, it involves driving residents off desirable land.

Residents have little legal protection—even when companies do illegal things to force them out.

[Chen Xuxing, Forced Eviction Victim]:
“Because we didn’t reach an agreement, three days later they employed thugs to break into my house.”

This is video footage from the surveillance camera on Mr. Chen’s house.

[Chen Xuxing, Forced Eviction Victim]:
“Several dozen people came, thugs came to break down my door…After beating me in the house until my head was bleeding, they pulled me outside to beat me. They said they had taken me outside to beat me so the neighbors could see, and that whoever doesn’t move will end up like this.”

Mr. Chen was hospitalized for two months.

He shot this footage after leaving the hospital. His street is filled with the debris of demolished houses. This couple stands in the ruins of their home—torn down with all their belongings still inside. Other houses are marked with the word “demolish.”

Mr. Chen says the development company was colluding with local officials. When Mr. Chen was attacked, neighbors called the police, but they didn’t show up until the following afternoon. Local authorities also refused to listen to the residents’ protests.

According to the Asia Advocacy Director at Human Rights Watch, this type of corruption is common in China.

[Sophie Richardson, Asia Advocacy Director, Human Rights Watch]:
“Corruption is an enormous problem inside China, and collusion between local business interests and officials is commonly cited in everything from people’s inability to access medical care to getting their cases taken in local courts.”

To make way for Shanghai’s World Expo, local authorities evicted an estimated eighteen thousand families from their homes. Hu Yan’s family was one of them.

In Ms. Hu’s case, Shanghai authorities reclassified the land that they took, leaving her family with little compensation. They received only about one-thirtieth of what the land was originally worth.

Ms. Hu says that the land reclassification broke the law, but no court would hear her case.

[Hu Yan, Forced Eviction Victim]: 2.54
“On August 15, 2005, China’s Supreme People’s Court ruled that no People’s Court will accept disputes to do with demolition and relocation.”

Ms. Hu’s home was destroyed in 2005. Since then, Chinese authorities have released new guidelines on forced evictions. But it seems that progress has been minimal.

[Sophie Richardson, Asia Advocacy Director, Human Rights Watch]:
“There have been comments made by the government that opportunities for consultation will be expanded, but whether that’s really been enforced, I think, is certainly up for debate.”

Still seeking justice, Ms. Hu has brought her protest to the United Nations in New York. After seeing her on the news, Mr. Chen—who now lives in the U.S.—joined her.

[Chen Xuxing, Forced Eviction Victim]:
“There is simply nowhere you can go to get your voice heard. There is no one taking care of these things, no one taking responsibility.”

[Hu Yan, Forced Eviction Victim]:
“Since the Shanghai government will not give me an explanation, I have now come abroad to international society. You have the whole world, 242 countries and international organizations participating in the Shanghai world Expo, aren’t you going to give the people who have been harmed a fair explanation? So I have come to international society to tell people the true situation [in China].”

Hu Yan has vowed to stay outside the United Nations until the Shanghai World Expo ends in October.

Ben Hedges, NTD News.

(Karen Chang and Shelley Zhang contributed to this report)

Duration : 0:4:46

Chen Xuxing’s house is gone. A local real estate developer in Wuhan wanted to use his land to build a park, but Mr. Chen didn’t agree. So the company forced him out of him home—and then demolished it.

It’s known as forced eviction, and in China, it’s one of the most serious problems facing the country today. Developers, often working with local officials, have rushed to cash in on a real estate boom. Often, it involves driving residents off desirable land.

Residents have little legal protection—even when companies do illegal things to force them out.

[Chen Xuxing, Forced Eviction Victim]:
“Because we didn’t reach an agreement, three days later they employed thugs to break into my house.”

This is video footage from the surveillance camera on Mr. Chen’s house.

[Chen Xuxing, Forced Eviction Victim]:
“Several dozen people came, thugs came to break down my door…After beating me in the house until my head was bleeding, they pulled me outside to beat me. They said they had taken me outside to beat me so the neighbors could see, and that whoever doesn’t move will end up like this.”

Mr. Chen was hospitalized for two months.

He shot this footage after leaving the hospital. His street is filled with the debris of demolished houses. This couple stands in the ruins of their home—torn down with all their belongings still inside. Other houses are marked with the word “demolish.”

Mr. Chen says the development company was colluding with local officials. When Mr. Chen was attacked, neighbors called the police, but they didn’t show up until the following afternoon. Local authorities also refused to listen to the residents’ protests.

According to the Asia Advocacy Director at Human Rights Watch, this type of corruption is common in China.

[Sophie Richardson, Asia Advocacy Director, Human Rights Watch]:
“Corruption is an enormous problem inside China, and collusion between local business interests and officials is commonly cited in everything from people’s inability to access medical care to getting their cases taken in local courts.”

To make way for Shanghai’s World Expo, local authorities evicted an estimated eighteen thousand families from their homes. Hu Yan’s family was one of them.

In Ms. Hu’s case, Shanghai authorities reclassified the land that they took, leaving her family with little compensation. They received only about one-thirtieth of what the land was originally worth.

Ms. Hu says that the land reclassification broke the law, but no court would hear her case.

[Hu Yan, Forced Eviction Victim]: 2.54
“On August 15, 2005, China’s Supreme People’s Court ruled that no People’s Court will accept disputes to do with demolition and relocation.”

Ms. Hu’s home was destroyed in 2005. Since then, Chinese authorities have released new guidelines on forced evictions. But it seems that progress has been minimal.

[Sophie Richardson, Asia Advocacy Director, Human Rights Watch]:
“There have been comments made by the government that opportunities for consultation will be expanded, but whether that’s really been enforced, I think, is certainly up for debate.”

Still seeking justice, Ms. Hu has brought her protest to the United Nations in New York. After seeing her on the news, Mr. Chen—who now lives in the U.S.—joined her.

[Chen Xuxing, Forced Eviction Victim]:
“There is simply nowhere you can go to get your voice heard. There is no one taking care of these things, no one taking responsibility.”

[Hu Yan, Forced Eviction Victim]:
“Since the Shanghai government will not give me an explanation, I have now come abroad to international society. You have the whole world, 242 countries and international organizations participating in the Shanghai world Expo, aren’t you going to give the people who have been harmed a fair explanation? So I have come to international society to tell people the true situation [in China].”

Hu Yan has vowed to stay outside the United Nations until the Shanghai World Expo ends in October.

Ben Hedges, NTD News.

(Karen Chang and Shelley Zhang contributed to this report)

Duration : 0:4:46

PLEASE DOWNLOAD THIS / SEND IT TO ALL YOUR FRIENDS / FAVOURITE IT!

Duration : 0:3:39

http://www.trendsresearch.com/

http://www.infowars.com/

http://www.prisonplanet.tv/

Duration : 0:10:59

Senator Joe Lieberman, co-author of a bill that would give President Obama a ‘kill switch’ to shut down parts of the Internet, attempted to reassure CNN viewers yesterday that concerns about the government regulating free speech on the web were overblown, but he only stoked more alarm by citing China, a country that censors all online dissent against the state, as the model to which American should compare itself.

Lieberman again invoked “cybersecurity” as the motivation behind the bill and tried to assuage the worries of critics. “So I say to my friends on the Internet, relax. Take a look at the bill. And this is something that we need to protect our country,” said the Senator.

However, Lieberman’s choice of comparison in justifying the necessity of the bill will only serve to heighten concerns that the government is going after free speech.

“Right now China, the government, can disconnect parts of its Internet in case of war and we need to have that here too,” said Lieberman.

The Senator’s reference to China is a telling revelation of what the cybersecurity agenda is really all about. China’s vice-like grip over its Internet systems has very little to do with “war” and everything to do with silencing all dissent against the state.

Chinese Internet censorship is imposed via a centralized government blacklist of any websites that contain criticism of the state, porn, or any other content deemed unsuitable by the authorities. Every time you attempt to visit a website, you are re-routed through the government firewall, often making for long delays and crippling speeds.

China has exercised its power to shut down the Internet, something that Lieberman wants to introduce in the U.S., at politically sensitive times in order to stem the flow of information about government abuse and atrocities. During the anti-government riots which occurred in July 2009, the Chinese government completely shut down the Internet across the entire northwestern region of Xinjiang for days. Similarly, Internet access in parts of Tibet is routinely restricted as part of government efforts to pre-empt and neutralize unrest.

Major websites like Twitter, Google and You Tube have also been shut down either temporarily or permanently by Chinese authorities.

News websites in China now require users to register their true identities in order to leave comments. This abolition of anonymity is used to chill free speech in that it prevents the user from engaging in criticism of the state for fear that they would be tracked down by authorities.

Chinese authorities are now going further than merely maintaining a “blacklist” of banned websites by instituting a “whitelist” of allowed websites, a move that “could potentially place much of the Internet off-limits to Chinese readers”. Websites not pre-registered with the government would be completely blocked to all Internet users, meaning “millions of completely innocuous sites” would be banned. This equates to requiring government approval to set up a website, which would obviously not be granted if the person or organization making the application has a history of or is likely to engage in dissent against the state.

President Obama himself has criticized Chinese Internet censorship as a hindrance to the free flow of information and allowing citizens to hold their governments accountable, and yet Lieberman wants to hand Obama similar powers.

Given the nature of Chinese Internet regulation, with has nothing to do with “war” as Lieberman claims and everything to do with political censorship and covering up information about state oppression, we should be alarmed that the Senator wants to see America move in the same direction.

The real agenda behind government control of the Internet has always been to strangle and suffocate independent media outlets who are now competing with and even displacing establishment press organs, with websites like the Drudge Report now attracting more traffic than many large newspapers combined. As part of this war against independent media, the FTC recently proposing a “Drudge Tax” that would force independent media organizations to pay fees that would be used to fund mainstream newspapers.

We have extensively covered efforts to scrap the internet as we know it and move toward a greatly restricted “internet 2″ system. Handing government the power to control the Internet would only be the first step towards this system, whereby individual ID’s and government permission would be required simply to operate a website.

Lieberman’s argument that the U.S. government should be handed the same power to regulate the Internet currently exercised by Chinese authorities only serves to confirm that the true agenda behind the Obama ‘kill switch’ legislation is to launch a war, not against foreign hackers, but against the free speech of the American people.

Duration : 0:7:25

Brzezinski explained that global political leadership had become “much more diversified unlike what it was until relatively recently,” noting the rise of China as a geopolitical power, and that global leadership in the context of the G20 was “lacking internal unity with many of its members in bilateral antagonisms.”

In other words, the global elite is infighting amongst itself and this is hampering efforts to rescue the agenda for global government, which seems to be failing on almost every front.

Brzezinski then explained another significant factor in that, “For the first time in all of human history mankind is politically awakened — that’s a total new reality — it has not been so for most of human history.”

Brzezinski continued, “The whole world has become politically awakened,” adding that all over the world people were aware of what was happening politically and were “consciously aware of global inequities, inequalities, lack of respect, exploitation.”

“Mankind is now politically awakened and stirring,” said Brzezinski, adding that this in combination with a fractured elite “makes it a much more difficult context for any major power, including currently the leading world power, the United States.”

During a subsequent question and answer session, Brzezinski was asked if he thought another organization should replace the United Nations as the de facto “one world government,” to which Brzezinski responded, “There should be such an organization,” before pointing out that the UN was not it in its current role.

As the text at the end of the video makes clear, Brzezinski’s admission that humanity has undergone a political awakening is not a positive development in the eyes of the elite.

In his 1970 book Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era, Brzezinski wrote the following.

“The technetronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities.”

The “elite” to which Brzezinski refers included many of those who were in attendance for his speech at the CFR meeting. The global political awakening which Brzezinski discussed represents part of the resistance to that very elite dominated society and the systems of control, subjugation and surveillance that they have imposed upon the human race in pursuit of a “more controlled society” and a one world government.

INFOWARS.COM
PRISONPLANET.COM

Duration : 0:6:5

http://www.infowars.com/

Paul Joseph Watson

http://www.prisonplanet.com/

Wednesday, May 27, 2009

A state of war officially exists again between North and South Korea for the first time since the end of hostilities in 1953 following North Koreas announcement that they would henceforth refuse to abide by the terms of the peace armistice.

The Korean Peoples Army will not be bound to the Armistice Agreement any longer, the official Korean Central News Agency said in a statement today. Any attempt to inspect North Korean vessels will be countered with prompt and strong military strikes. South Koreas military said it will deal sternly with any provocation from the North, reports Bloomberg.

As we have highlighted, any North Korean attack on South Korea will be countered by the United States, which is allied with South Korea. North Korea is allied with China, and Chinese military forces will support North Korea in any conflict just as they did in the 1950s before the armistice was signed.

North Koreas renouncement of the peace armistice follows yesterdays threat by a Japanese ruling party minister that Japan should change the terms of its pacifist constitution in order to conduct cruise missile strikes on North Korea.

Meanwhile, Russia has warned that the conflict could go nuclear and has made preparations to safeguard its far eastern regions.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/state-of-war-between-two-koreas-after-armistice-ended.html

Duration : 0:7:42