Q&A: Who said “when the people fear the government there is tyranny”?
Question by WinonaGal: Who said “when the people fear the government there is tyranny”?
Who said this?
What was this person referring to?
How can you relate to this in your modern life?
Best answer:
Answer by RJC
Thomas Jefferson
When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.
He was speaking of freedom from government intrusion.
Add your own answer in the comments!
When did Thomas Jefferson say, “”When the people fear their government, there is tyranny….”?
Question by PyneApple: When did Thomas Jefferson say, “”When the people fear their government, there is tyranny….”?
Just need to know….thanks! 
The rest goes like this: “When the people fear their government, there is tyranny, when the government fears its people, there is liberty.”
Best answer:
Answer by william_byrnes2000
I checked with the Thomas Jefferson Encyclopedia, a wiki found at the Monticello site. They found no proof that he ever said it, and that the earliest evidence seems to be something attributed to him in the Federalist, a body of work Jefferson would definitely not have had a part in creating.
Here’s the link to the page
Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!
feminist government tyranny is to deny others their constitutional Due Process
style = “float: left; margin:;: 80% font-size 5px” img alt javascript:void(0);farm2.static.flickr.com/1293/837754646_7b292f7a0e_m div> < <= "" tyranny "" src = "http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1293/837754646_7b292f7a0e_m.jpg"width =" 160 "/>
by StaneStane
feminist government tyranny is to deny others their constitutional href = “javascript:void(0);www.articlesbase.com/” Two Directory of free online articles Why Submit Articles? Authors Top Articles Top FAQ title = “Answers” ABAnswers Post article / a> 0 & & $ . Browser.msie) {var = ie_version parseInt ($ browser.version) If (ie_version Login = “#comments” title = “Login Connecting via Register Hello href = “/login” My homepage “/ logout” out E-Class Email
class = “clear”
Password = “clear” Remember me?
Forgot password
Homepage Law Articles > Government Is feminist tyranny deny others their constitutional two feminist tyrants government exists to deny others their constitutional Due Process Edit article | Publication Date: December 1, 2009 | Comments: 0 | ]] tyrannies>
And so began the tyranny against fathers, family and freedom both here and throughout the Western world. This article is the first in a series state the nature of tyranny and how we must regain control of the tyrannical government of society to secure freedom for all.
… But the funds have increased more programs that supported the pressure for more changes in laws and perverse -. amendments that men and fathers denied their fundamental rights feminists instigated by government policies and laws that their intentions as a “common good” that the rights we take all free -. Vista that is the hallmark of tyranny By “feminist jurisprudence” in place, particularly within the national administrations concerned, “good” intentions that “the interest of the child “or” women’s safety are now being used to deny constitutional rights and protections for everyone – but especially men and fathers p On the basis of two denials of rights and < . constitutional protections Fathers held under the action of divorce or paternity and men accused of domestic violence become the specious pretext and fodder for the government's control over their lives and their incomes. This tyranny has fostered the growth of a 0000000000 + energy industry affiliated with the government of fathers in the Constitution as private and public control and the ever-increasing demands.
In short, the feminist tyranny of this government takes the “noble more like that good intentions “best interests of the child” and “women’s safety ‘to justify the reason to deny others their rights and protections. The” best interests of the child “principle is used in divorce proceedings and fatherhood as a parent to deny parental rights to physical and legal custody of his son -. At least equal to that of the mother In this way, the court and therefore the state practically to remove her child and therefore the payments extortion demand euphemistically called “child support” until age 20 or older. The industry affiliated with the government takes those payments, the ongoing litigation and more, and many other government programs, has helped to control and manipulate the life of his father., earnings, properties, and the pursuit of happiness for himself and his son
women’s safety “principle is used in both Jersey divorce and paternity, and in all circumstances to take a man out of the country. of his house and limit the places where he can go. It is only a” accusation of abuse – no trial, that is, without rules of evidence to punish him by law, “abuse” can be subjective state of -. “women (read victim) mind -. and not physical, he can be jailed until a hearing – perhaps three months, but if he admits to violence, will be left out so he could keep his job This is a good way to get “the abuse of numbers” to justify these programs wrong. more violence. extortion works wonders
No constitutional due process protection against false accusations means that innocent people are thrown out of their homes, losing their possessions, refused to see their children and go to jail all the time -.. And, of course, means that a woman’s “evil” can count on the tyranny of Government to help steal a feminist man, the rights, property, income and children This is what I summarize quickly the fact that men and fathers face true Yes, but why would you believe it’s true that I need to protect the Constitution – which is our fundamental rights and the high level of protection of due process has completely ignored for men and fathers set divorce, paternity actions and actions of domestic violence aptly named by the government. child support and financing subsidiaries of domestic violence huge industry allows him to announce the inherent “evil of the men. “Wedding is distant fathers or unwilling to support their children. They do not have the interest of the child at heart or the safety of women. This is propaganda false. But it is important to defame those who deny rights. Thus tyranny forever. (#comments 1527816 ArticlesBase SC)
Retrieved from “ javascript:void(0);www.articlesbase.com/law- Articles / Government-feminist-tyranny-exists-denying-men-Their-Constitutional due- -process-1527816.html / a> “class =
/ a> Read his ebook, “rationally to financial independence ‘=> www.SovereignU.com http: / / / a>
]]> Questions and answers Ask our experts your questions here about the law … class = title = “Ask” “qa_ask_btn” Ask 200 characters left How many men wrote the Constitution? How many men were at the Constitutional Court
Shane FLAiTE the href =” javascript:void(0);www.articlesbase.com/law-articles/ “ From:. Shane FLAiTE
Why are Republicans afraid of the “tyranny” of the government, but the constant excuses from tyranny?
Question Earl Grey : Why are Republicans afraid of the “tyranny” of the government, but the resolution of apology tyrannical
beaurocracies care insurance company to dictate the sidelines? “I asked the same question type before and used the wrong text. All used as an excuse to avoid the real issue and call me an idiot. Here we go again best answer:.
pfat response
Why Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh tells them to do.
What do you think? Answer below!
Alex Jones – TSA Groping Out Of Control 1_3!
Everything you need to know about the security takeover and why airport oppression is already being rolled out on the streets
TSA abuse in airports is completely out of control with more and more cases of security workers groping women, fondling children, abusing naked body scanners, and interrogating passengers emerging every week, and yet the government’s answer to the epidemic of oppression is to hand TSA thugs more power with which to harass American citizens.
The story of Infowars employee Michelle, who along with her child was sexually assaulted by TSA staff after refusing to go through a naked body scanner, has gone viral on the Internet after it was picked up by the Drudge Report, a website leading the charge in the backlash against airport oppression at the hands of the TSA that has now led to the world’s largest pilot’s association boycotting the use of naked body scanners.
Michelle’s traumatic experience represents just the tip of the iceberg.
The launch of naked body scanners, which were hastily installed in the wake of the Christmas Day bombing attempt despite the fact that they would not have stopped the attack, has only worsened the levels of abuse dished out to passengers.
The body scanners were vigorously promoted by people like former Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff and others who stood to reap a financial windfall from their implementation, despite the fact that scientists at Columbia University and the Inter-Agency Committee on Radiation Safety, along with other scientific bodies, have all warned that the devices increase the risk of developing cancer.
Stories about TSA officials abusing the use of the scanners have become commonplace.
44-year-old Rolando Negrin beat his supervisor with a police baton after he had cracked jokes about Negrin’s small manhood when he walked through a naked scanner as part of a training exercise at Miami International Airport. The story underscored the fact that authorities had been lying all along about the claim that the scanners did not show sensitive details of genitalia.
The aggressive campaign on behalf of governments and the media to sell the public on invasive body scanners has been accompanied by the reassurance that the devices do not show details of genitals, an obvious attempt to counter the fact that the machines represent a virtual strip search as well as violating laws against child pornography.
Despite assurances from the TSA that the scanners do not show the shape of genitalia, sample images from their own website clearly display the outline of the penis. In addition, after nearly a year of authorities lying in claiming that the technology used in airports did not allow the naked images to be saved or transmitted, it emerged that police agencies, including the U.S. Marshals Service, who were using the same systems, were storing naked body scanner images. The TSA’s own documents also confirmed that the machines must “allow exporting of image data in real time” and provide a mechanism for “high-speed transfer of image data over the network.”
Indian film star Shahrukh Khan told a BBC talk show that naked images of his body from the scanner were printed out and circulated by airport staff at Heathrow in London. Heathrow denied the claim but Khan himself never retracted the story, and had no apparent motive for making it up.
Heathrow authorities were unable to deny a later example of the scanners being abused, when it emerged that a Heathrow worker had perved over a naked image of a female colleague after she passed through one of the devices, before commenting, “I love those gigantic tits”.
Jo Margetson, 29, reported John Laker, 25, to the police after she had entered the x-ray machine by mistake and Laker took the image before making lewd comments.
Airport security staff workers are among the least trustworthy people to operate these machines. These individuals are routinely caught abusing their authority for their own ego trip or sexual perversion.
As the video below illustrates, the fact that naked body scanner machines in the U.S. are manned by TSA thugs who are routinely caught abusing their power in treating the public like prison inmates only heightens the danger posed by the use of the new devices.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/
http://www.infowars.com/
http://www.infowarsshop.com/
Duration : 0:14:51
The People’s Will – AusCivics Critique and Review Series
Media description: Two scenes from the movie Cromwell (Columbia Pictures1970) where Oliver Cromwell and King Charles 1, argue their differing political ideologies.
MEDIA CONTEXT
Oliver Cromwell (Richard Harris) is the lead character in the Columbia Pictures film, Cromwell. Based on the historical figure’s life and the tumultuous events of 17th Century England, during the reign of Charles Stuart 1 (Alec Guinness), the viewer follows Cromwell on an emotion charged journey. As a strict Puritan — having, according to historians, converted to that faith in his 30s — Cromwell seeks to do what he understands to be God’s will in establishing an English democracy, where Parliament would act upon the will of the people and not for its own interests, or that of the monarch’s. Cromwell is depicted as one rising from relative obscurity to taking effective leadership of an army during years of civil war, then on to being dubbed Lord Protector of the nation — after usurpation of the monarchy. From historical accounts it is thought Cromwell played only a minor role in Parliament, but he is portrayed by director Ken Hughes as a prime mover in the execution of King Charles 1 and thereafter the purging of Parliament. In the Columbia Pictures film Cromwell obtains personal audience with the king on several occasions where they debate their opposing views of proper government.
MEDIA CRITIQUE
Do the film makers present an accurate character portrayal of the historical figure Oliver Cromwell? Does the film Cromwell demonstrate the political events of the period accurately? Most historians struggle to form solid conclusions about what exactly caused the civil war. What degree of involvement in events is the viewer left feeling Cromwell had? Does this align with the consensus among historians? Is the portrayal of King Charles 1 as a man of wavering principles — at once a loving husband and father, then a harsh, calculating ruler — a fair representation of what is known about this king?
ANALYSIS & REVIEW
1. According to the Australian Constitution, what role does Queen Elizabeth 2 play in the government of Australia?
2. Using the 21 August, 2010 Federal Election as an example, discuss how the current Australian system may be considered a “true representation of a free people.”
3. Consider the implications of a military regime as opposed to a “constitutional government”, e.g. Fiji.
4. If a time did come when “parliament no longer represent[ed] the people of this nation,” what constitutional power do Australian citizens have to ensure a true representation? Discuss.
THE AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION & AUSTRALIA TODAY
The Protectorate under Cromwell followed a civil war and had many flaws, but it also laid the foundations for future systems of English government. Unlike England and many other countries, Australia didn’t need a civil war or period of great unrest to achieve Federation and a workable constitution. This is a remarkable feat achieved by building on the learning of the past. Do you feel that Australian’s, in general, have enough appreciation of the traditions and heritage on which our constitution and our way of life are based?
PERSONAL APPLICATION
As an individual do you feel that you have a sufficient appreciation of the traditions and heritage on which our constitution and our way of life are based? Is there something you could do personally (preferably not for a school assignment) to gain a greater awareness of Australia’s constitutional heritage? What is it?
Duration : 0:4:53
