Question by WinonaGal: Who said “when the people fear the government there is tyranny”?
Who said this?
What was this person referring to?
How can you relate to this in your modern life?

Best answer:

Answer by RJC
Thomas Jefferson

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

He was speaking of freedom from government intrusion.

Add your own answer in the comments!

Best answer:

Answer by william_byrnes2000
I checked with the Thomas Jefferson Encyclopedia, a wiki found at the Monticello site. They found no proof that he ever said it, and that the earliest evidence seems to be something attributed to him in the Federalist, a body of work Jefferson would definitely not have had a part in creating.

Here’s the link to the page

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

And so began the tyranny against fathers, family and freedom both here and throughout the Western world. This article is the first in a series state the nature of tyranny and how we must regain control of the tyrannical government of society to secure freedom for all.

… But the funds have increased more programs that supported the pressure for more changes in laws and perverse -. amendments that men and fathers denied their fundamental rights feminists instigated by government policies and laws that their intentions as a “common good” that the rights we take all free -. Vista that is the hallmark of tyranny By “feminist jurisprudence” in place, particularly within the national administrations concerned, “good” intentions that “the interest of the child “or” women’s safety are now being used to deny constitutional rights and protections for everyone – but especially men and fathers p On the basis of two denials of rights and < . constitutional protections Fathers held under the action of divorce or paternity and men accused of domestic violence become the specious pretext and fodder for the government's control over their lives and their incomes. This tyranny has fostered the growth of a 0000000000 + energy industry affiliated with the government of fathers in the Constitution as private and public control and the ever-increasing demands.

women’s safety “principle is used in both Jersey divorce and paternity, and in all circumstances to take a man out of the country. of his house and limit the places where he can go. It is only a” accusation of abuse – no trial, that is, without rules of evidence to punish him by law, “abuse” can be subjective state of -. “women (read victim) mind -. and not physical, he can be jailed until a hearing – perhaps three months, but if he admits to violence, will be left out so he could keep his job This is a good way to get “the abuse of numbers” to justify these programs wrong. more violence. extortion works wonders

No constitutional due process protection against false accusations means that innocent people are thrown out of their homes, losing their possessions, refused to see their children and go to jail all the time -.. And, of course, means that a woman’s “evil” can count on the tyranny of Government to help steal a feminist man, the rights, property, income and children This is what I summarize quickly the fact that men and fathers face true Yes, but why would you believe it’s true that I need to protect the Constitution – which is our fundamental rights and the high level of protection of due process has completely ignored for men and fathers set divorce, paternity actions and actions of domestic violence aptly named by the government. child support and financing subsidiaries of domestic violence huge industry allows him to announce the inherent “evil of the men. “Wedding is distant fathers or unwilling to support their children. They do not have the interest of the child at heart or the safety of women. This is propaganda false. But it is important to defame those who deny rights. Thus tyranny forever.
Retrieved from “ javascript:void(0);www.articlesbase.com/law- Articles / Government-feminist-tyranny-exists-denying-men-Their-Constitutional due- -process-1527816.html / a> “class =

(#comments 1527816 ArticlesBase SC)

traffic simply submit articles for us, click here to begin. you like this article? Click here to post on your website or blog, It’s easy and free! articles “/ authors/shane- flait/130689 “title =” Articles of Shane FLAiTE “> Shane FLAiTE – About the Author < - - nextpage!>:

/ a> Read his ebook, “rationally to financial independence ‘=> www.SovereignU.com http: / / / a>

]]> Questions and answers Ask our experts your questions here about the law … class = title = “Ask” “qa_ask_btn” Ask 200 characters left How many men wrote the Constitution? How many men were at the Constitutional Court What two powers denied by Congress in the Constitution? Rate this article nofollow 2 nofollow 4 nofollow 5 (s) 0 vote (s) comments RSS Print >: / a> Article Tags:
, href href=”/rss/authors/130689″> , human , href href=”/rss/authors/130689″> , / a> href =”/feedback/1527816″> Videos Related articles Latest Law Articles More FLAiTE Shane East Does Dark Void Grey / Nikola Tesla characters Developer Diary Fri, Capcom and developer Airtight Games Profile brauny past agile protagonist rocketeering William Grey and Agustus legend invented Serb, Nikola Tesla and how the couple will overcome the tyranny of the Watchers and escape into space. (5:01) Parenting Stories Thu We asked” What news do you have your head on the health of your children? “for our group of experienced moms and dads. Hormones in milk? polycarbonate? painting Lead? Chinese hormones? (2:20) Sentrion Sendmail for Enterprise Message Management Thu, Sendmail is not your father’s SMTP server. Sentrion mail server is a sophisticated enough that the political management of comprehensive protection of data leakage, encryption of messages, e- mail sender reputation, and routing application messaggi.Prezzo: less than each user with a minimum of 1000 utenti.Pro: • Very complex process message routing can be built for a wide range of purposes • Compliance and governance can be built into the messaging infrastructure (05:23) -. feminist tyranny export from the United States in the world Thu feminist refers to the procedures supported by the government, which, of course, deny basic rights to fathers, under the guise of a” common good. “What goes well the interests of the child. The system is a sham feminist, but it is well funded This article summarizes the themes of this tyranny, and how it spread awareness how to destroy society and the rights of fathers From: .. the href = “javascript:void(0);” title = News and News & Society > = “javascript:void(0);www. articlesbase.com / politics-articles / “title =” Politics policy 7 September 2010 LView: 137 Apologies “common good” feminists deny the constitutional rights of fathers in family courts Thu Family Court unfairly uses the “best interests of the child” excuse “common good” of ignoring constitutional rights and protections of fathers overwhelming. Its installation and use of “abuses” the greater good excuse, even, the show has no interest in protecting the rights of a father, but to deny her children and her snatch Earnings for the best interest of the mother From:. FLAiTE Shane the href = “javascript:void(0);” alt = “Law April 8, 2011 Government promotes tyranny and state feminist matriarchal family Thurs feminist privilege applied mainly in the family law feminist jurisprudence call – bypasses constitutional protections and most of the common law is intended to create freedom and equity for all This article shows how feminist jurisprudence supports families under state control and matriarchal. < -! nextpage -> Fathers guide the control of the family of slaves in the positions of the United States’ mandate still no From: FLAiTE Shane the href = “javascript:void(0);www.articlesbase .com / law-articles / “ right December 9, 2009 The Fathers’ Declaration of the Rights of rebellion

Shane FLAiTE the href =” javascript:void(0);www.articlesbase.com/law-articles/ “ October 12, 2010 defenders Err rights law in an attempt Looking for new laws to protect the rights Thu Under our current government, as a father is usually deprived of his right to the mother of his children in a divorce action or paternity leave. But the government – under the guise of family court – refuse, then, most of his basic rights, while extorting money from him under the euphemism of support for the use of Mother No law requires that extorted money to use.. for a new child legislation, if passed, will surely be ignored and a waste of time

From:. Shane FLAiTE January 28, 2011 law are rights, not rights and privileges tyrannical Wed In a free society,” rights “means that the inalienable rights of America’s founding document, the Declaration of Independence -.” right inalienable right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness “Government is formed to provide this for all of us. But feminism uses women’s rights as a rising force imposed by the state benefits and privileges for women directly deny the inalienable rights of men and fathers From:. the href = ” javascript:void(0);www.articlesbase.com/law-articles/ “ law March 5, 2011 is a euphemism for extracting useful Fathers Fit unjustly deprived of their children Thu, If we all support her children? Yes, but no law requires child support ordered by the court to be spent for the child. And the amount of child support is ordered not related to the cost of maintaining a child. But the “child support” using the term is a euphemism to cover a useful mass regime of extortion that affects fathers. and their children, families and freedom Here’s how From:. FLAiTE Shane href = “s javascript:void(0);www.articlesbase.com / law-articles / “ right January 24, 2011

Why Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh tells them to do.

What do you think? Answer below!

TSA abuse in airports is completely out of control with more and more cases of security workers groping women, fondling children, abusing naked body scanners, and interrogating passengers emerging every week, and yet the government’s answer to the epidemic of oppression is to hand TSA thugs more power with which to harass American citizens.

The story of Infowars employee Michelle, who along with her child was sexually assaulted by TSA staff after refusing to go through a naked body scanner, has gone viral on the Internet after it was picked up by the Drudge Report, a website leading the charge in the backlash against airport oppression at the hands of the TSA that has now led to the world’s largest pilot’s association boycotting the use of naked body scanners.

Michelle’s traumatic experience represents just the tip of the iceberg.

The launch of naked body scanners, which were hastily installed in the wake of the Christmas Day bombing attempt despite the fact that they would not have stopped the attack, has only worsened the levels of abuse dished out to passengers.

The body scanners were vigorously promoted by people like former Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff and others who stood to reap a financial windfall from their implementation, despite the fact that scientists at Columbia University and the Inter-Agency Committee on Radiation Safety, along with other scientific bodies, have all warned that the devices increase the risk of developing cancer.

Stories about TSA officials abusing the use of the scanners have become commonplace.

44-year-old Rolando Negrin beat his supervisor with a police baton after he had cracked jokes about Negrin’s small manhood when he walked through a naked scanner as part of a training exercise at Miami International Airport. The story underscored the fact that authorities had been lying all along about the claim that the scanners did not show sensitive details of genitalia.

The aggressive campaign on behalf of governments and the media to sell the public on invasive body scanners has been accompanied by the reassurance that the devices do not show details of genitals, an obvious attempt to counter the fact that the machines represent a virtual strip search as well as violating laws against child pornography.

Despite assurances from the TSA that the scanners do not show the shape of genitalia, sample images from their own website clearly display the outline of the penis. In addition, after nearly a year of authorities lying in claiming that the technology used in airports did not allow the naked images to be saved or transmitted, it emerged that police agencies, including the U.S. Marshals Service, who were using the same systems, were storing naked body scanner images. The TSA’s own documents also confirmed that the machines must “allow exporting of image data in real time” and provide a mechanism for “high-speed transfer of image data over the network.”

Indian film star Shahrukh Khan told a BBC talk show that naked images of his body from the scanner were printed out and circulated by airport staff at Heathrow in London. Heathrow denied the claim but Khan himself never retracted the story, and had no apparent motive for making it up.

Heathrow authorities were unable to deny a later example of the scanners being abused, when it emerged that a Heathrow worker had perved over a naked image of a female colleague after she passed through one of the devices, before commenting, “I love those gigantic tits”.

Jo Margetson, 29, reported John Laker, 25, to the police after she had entered the x-ray machine by mistake and Laker took the image before making lewd comments.

Airport security staff workers are among the least trustworthy people to operate these machines. These individuals are routinely caught abusing their authority for their own ego trip or sexual perversion.

As the video below illustrates, the fact that naked body scanner machines in the U.S. are manned by TSA thugs who are routinely caught abusing their power in treating the public like prison inmates only heightens the danger posed by the use of the new devices.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/

http://www.infowars.com/

http://www.infowarsshop.com/

Duration : 0:14:51

MEDIA CONTEXT
Oliver Cromwell (Richard Harris) is the lead character in the Columbia Pictures film, Cromwell. Based on the historical figure’s life and the tumultuous events of 17th Century England, during the reign of Charles Stuart 1 (Alec Guinness), the viewer follows Cromwell on an emotion charged journey. As a strict Puritan — having, according to historians, converted to that faith in his 30s — Cromwell seeks to do what he understands to be God’s will in establishing an English democracy, where Parliament would act upon the will of the people and not for its own interests, or that of the monarch’s. Cromwell is depicted as one rising from relative obscurity to taking effective leadership of an army during years of civil war, then on to being dubbed Lord Protector of the nation — after usurpation of the monarchy. From historical accounts it is thought Cromwell played only a minor role in Parliament, but he is portrayed by director Ken Hughes as a prime mover in the execution of King Charles 1 and thereafter the purging of Parliament. In the Columbia Pictures film Cromwell obtains personal audience with the king on several occasions where they debate their opposing views of proper government.

MEDIA CRITIQUE
Do the film makers present an accurate character portrayal of the historical figure Oliver Cromwell? Does the film Cromwell demonstrate the political events of the period accurately? Most historians struggle to form solid conclusions about what exactly caused the civil war. What degree of involvement in events is the viewer left feeling Cromwell had? Does this align with the consensus among historians? Is the portrayal of King Charles 1 as a man of wavering principles — at once a loving husband and father, then a harsh, calculating ruler — a fair representation of what is known about this king?

ANALYSIS & REVIEW
1. According to the Australian Constitution, what role does Queen Elizabeth 2 play in the government of Australia?
2. Using the 21 August, 2010 Federal Election as an example, discuss how the current Australian system may be considered a “true representation of a free people.”
3. Consider the implications of a military regime as opposed to a “constitutional government”, e.g. Fiji.
4. If a time did come when “parliament no longer represent[ed] the people of this nation,” what constitutional power do Australian citizens have to ensure a true representation? Discuss.

THE AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION & AUSTRALIA TODAY
The Protectorate under Cromwell followed a civil war and had many flaws, but it also laid the foundations for future systems of English government. Unlike England and many other countries, Australia didn’t need a civil war or period of great unrest to achieve Federation and a workable constitution. This is a remarkable feat achieved by building on the learning of the past. Do you feel that Australian’s, in general, have enough appreciation of the traditions and heritage on which our constitution and our way of life are based?

PERSONAL APPLICATION
As an individual do you feel that you have a sufficient appreciation of the traditions and heritage on which our constitution and our way of life are based? Is there something you could do personally (preferably not for a school assignment) to gain a greater awareness of Australia’s constitutional heritage? What is it?

Duration : 0:4:53

http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com/

http://www.infowars.com/

http://www.prisonplanet.com/

http://www.prisonplanet.tv/

FAIR USE NOTICE: This video contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues of ecological and humanitarian significance. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material in this video is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. lf you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Duration : 0:10:58

http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com/

http://www.infowars.com/

http://www.prisonplanet.com/

http://www.prisonplanet.tv/

FAIR USE NOTICE: This video contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues of ecological and humanitarian significance. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material in this video is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. lf you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Duration : 0:6:52

UPHOLD THE CONSTITUTION
DEFEND THE BILL OF RIGHTS
PRESERVE THE REPUBLIC

wake up project truth alex jones david icke noreagaaa william bill cooper illuminati industry exposed bank federal reserve brainwashed public secret love hope help rothschilds jp morgan chase rockafeller dynasty un obama bush clinton harvard yale pristine skull and bones exposed documentary queen monarchy evil traders cashless manipulation world global currency movement awakening cant stop people bible book of revelation religion ufo aliens ancient elite reptilians space america usa britain europe canada lilwayne jayz kanye beyond deception forrunner777 jfezzy the arrivals endgame fall of the republic no nut jobs here conspiracy realist gmo fluoride poison high fructose corn syrup aspartame organic gold tupac rappers lady gaga william copper jordan maxwell theorist change channel no nwo satanist alister crowley evil peace of freemasons christianity catholic islam muslin 2010 2012 all seeing eye egypt mysteries hours devil lucifer god jesus angel click my channel

Duration : 0:10:0

http://cuttingthroughthematrix.com/

http://www.prisonplanet.com/

http://www.infowars.com/

Duration : 0:9:25