The ‘Rule of Law’ Promotes Liberty or Fosters Tyranny. It all Depends
The ‘Rule of Law’ Promotes Liberty or Fosters Tyranny. It all Depends
Free Online Articles Directory
Why Submit Articles?
Top Authors
Top Articles
FAQ
ABAnswers
0 && $ .browser.msie ) {
var ie_version = parseInt($ .browser.version);
if(ie_version Login
Register
Hello
My Home
Sign Out
Email
Password
Remember me?
Lost Password?
Home Page > Law > The ‘Rule of Law’ Promotes Liberty or Fosters Tyranny. It all Depends
The ‘Rule of Law’ Promotes Liberty or Fosters Tyranny. It all Depends
Posted: Mar 13, 2011 |Comments: 0
|
]]>
Often you hear that we are ruled by laws – not by men. That implies the laws are just and protect our liberty, whereas men (and women) rule when opportunity arises to their own interests with disbenefit to others. But, of course, laws are continually created and modified by men and women to serve their interests. So, bad laws that can tyrannize some people are to be expected.
Then, when is the ‘rule of law’ promoting liberty and not fostering tyranny? It does so when it secures our unalienable rights through court processes that preserve them for each of us.
The freedom that we seek is really liberty. Liberty is freedom restrained and preserved through law. It guarantees our unalienable rights (our liberties) which are self-evident ‘rights’ embedded in the psyche of man. They arise from his nature and are unchanging.
America’s Declaration of Independence founded the U.S. as a government whose purpose is to secure the unalienable rights of life, liberty, and happiness for each of us. These include one’s right to self-determination, to own property, to parent his child, to pursue whatever profession or enterprise he wishes, among others.
The laws which a country devises are man-made laws so they are subject to the whims, interests, and errors of those that form the laws and the rules by which they’re carried out. Good laws are those that secure the unalienable rights for each of us. But the power of special interest groups can often pervert laws jeopardizing or denying rights of some.
Bad laws were expected by our founding fathers who were tyrannized by England’s treatment of them as colonials. They also recognized that laws deteriorate over time as special interest groups grow too much in influence and control within governmental affairs.
Seeking to guarantee our rights against the government, the founding fathers created the Bill of Rights (now complemented by further amendments) which purported to express some of our rights and restrict government infringement of them. Such rights are not subject to be voted down; they’re to be secured only. They make us a republic and not a pure democracy subject to tyrannical factions.
We each confront the laws of our land when we go to court either as a defendant against the state or as a litigant in a civil suit. So courts are where the ‘rubber meets the road’ – i.e. where you find out if your government is securing your inalienable rights or not. It’s the judicial system with its rules and processes that determine if your rights are protected – or not.
*Right to trial by informed jury as protection against corrupt judicial processes and bad laws:
Because of judiciary’s unique position of authority over the laws and its rules, the founding fathers believed it to be most vulnerable to perverting the meaning of good laws and forging bad processes under their own or others’ special interests. To counter the exclusive control of the judiciary by the judicial elite, a trial by an informed jury was built into the Bill of Rights even where only a substantial sum of money was at stake in a trial.
The jury was the public’s way of participating in the judicial process as a protection against judicial perversions or the bad laws it tries to enforce. The jury is considered ‘informed’ because it had the right not only to judge the truth or falsity of the evidence, but find the defendant innocent despite the evidence if they considered the law unjust or unfair.
Thomas Jefferson considered that guaranteeing an informed jury for trials was the only way yet known to man to preserve the principles of the constitution against bad laws and a perverted judiciary. Some even considered the right to an informed jury more important to preserving our liberty than the right to vote.
*Incorporating the Maxims of law promotes truth, justice and fairness in courts:
Since it’s in the court and its processes where your rights are in jeopardy, it’s important that those processes and judgments reflect and incorporate those self-evident truths that we all know should apply. These are called Maxims of law.
The job of the Maxims is to bring out the truth of the matter. That’s because without truth you can’t have justice. And without justice, you can’t have liberty. So where the Maxims are ignored, the court is denying justice to a defendant or a litigant.
*What function do Maxims promote in Court processes?
Maxims:
- Promote truth by requiring only sworn testimony against a defendant or litigant and require that perjury be punished when evident.
- Don’t subject litigants to laws that are vague – not clear to exactly what’s required or due. Wrongs must be clearly wrong to reasonable persons – not made up whims of special interest groups
- Require clear and convincing proof for wrongs done – not accusations and preconceived victims and perpetrators
- Recognize that litigants’ motives often determine the nature of their testimony
- Imposes no punishment or obligation where no wrong is done
- Matches obligations and the benefits that accompany them to the same litigant
- Assures the legal processes that benefit one person are not denied to another person.
It’s hard to believe that there are courts that ignore such self-evident requirements to help promote fair judgments. But there are.
*Does the rule of law you’re living under mean liberty or tyranny?
Courts are where our rights are in jeopardy – where our unalienable rights are secured or not. Their position of final authority on what’s legal – versus what’s right and just – makes them dangerous to litigants and the principles of liberty.
Those who would tyrannize some while benefiting others, will do so through the judiciary and those court processes that exclude informed juries, ignore the Maxims of law, and enforce legal excuses that profess to be a greater good than our unalienable rights.
Now you can recognize if you’re tyrannized or receiving justice according to the ‘rule of law’ you’re subject to.
Terry Kline surrendering in standoff “POLICE BRUTALITY” (1).avi
Disabled and holding a cane over my head seen here I was SHOT and kicked in the head repeatedly. Once a Buxbaum murder suspect innocent of all charges. I was found hidden after 25 years @ 730 Lorne AVE. LONDON,ON CANADA . Shot and kicked repeatedly in the head while I surrendered after a LONDON city bylaws complaint. “They saw what they wanted and they came back to take all my personal articles”. FREEDOM isn’t what they claim it to be they took all my belongings”. They also took my self and two children ages 9 and 17 down at gun point in the down town at around noon again on the 31 of August 2009. These kinds of actions are the reasons I live in fear of this so called Canadian FREEDOM we are trying to give other countries. So we have been trying to write a book to tell the public the truth of what is going on. Court hearing tomorrow but we are asking for help to speak out about injustices. We have begged different offices of the media and government for help and tonight for the first time I show and ask the public for their support understanding and help
Duration : 0:7:50
Project Camelot interviews con men, illuminati, and Crazies such as Jordan Mexwell and Robert O’Dean
A World Of Disinformation: Project Camelot Exposed.
http://pakalert.wordpress.com/2009/08/30/a-world-of-disinformation-project-camelot-exposed/
Project Camelot was a genuine US Army project in 1964. Wikipedia gives a reasonably accurate, short description:
“Project Camelot was a social science research project of the United States Army in 1964. The goal of the project was to assess the causes of violent social rebellion and to identify the actions a government could take to prevent its own overthrow.”
source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Camelot
Which was immediately changed upon the release of this article.
Update : Project Camelot Morphs Overnight Into ‘Project Camelot’
Military Project Related To Radio Show?
http://rense.com/general87/milrel.htm
PROJECT CAMELOT
http://www.rense.com/general87/cam.htm
From The Rise and Fall of Project Camelot: Studies in the Relationship Between Social Science and Practical Politics, Irving Louis Horowitz, ed. (Cambridge MA: The M.I.T. Press, 1967), pp. 47-49 (document) and 232-36 (Jorge Montes):
Document Number 1
http://www.cia-on-campus.org/social/camelot.html
The project is conceived as a three to four-year effort to be funded at around one and one-half million dollars annually. It is supported by the Army and the Department of Defense, and will be conducted with the cooperation of other agencies of the government.
If you can’t hit this one out of the ball park, you had better hang it up.
What if one modus operandi of the MATRIX control structure is to identify sore, social and political pressure points that are concerning growing numbers of people (UFOs, Black Ops, Black Budget, financial corruption, alternative energy, government cover-ups, the secret space program, etc.), and then establish Project Camelot-style operations (the U.S. military’s term) in the ‘alternative media’ to try to relieve that pressure by trotting out an endless succession of fake or tired “whistle blowers” — many of whom (most?) somehow will never manage to concretely, objectively, CONCLUSIVELY prove ANYTHING of much consequence, while simultaneously blowing a lot of hot air, ego, and disinformation smoke all over the place, thereby vicariously occupying the minds and time of large numbers of otherwise potentially politically active people with endless mystification, petty dramas, spectacular and inevitably unverifiable allegations, shadowy personages of uncertain identity, and so on, ad nauseam.
Among the key giveaways of such operations and operators is their ‘overnight’ sudden appearance and full-blown ‘presence’. First, the slick, well-funded website appears followed by the inevitable internet radio ‘truth’ program…of which there are countless hundreds now. Sometimes ‘conferences’ and seminars are organized usually staffed with the same old familiar information (and disinformation) merchants.
There are different tactics for quickly establishing a ‘name’ in such operations. The easiest technique is to spew out a string of relatively solid and sometimes new information to draw interest, establish some ‘buzz’ and credibility. Another method is to attack some of the established names in the alternative field, accusing them of being ‘agents provocateurs’, and baiting them into defending themselves, thereby wasting their time and energy. Yet another way is to accumulate a string of ‘names’ as writers and radio guests to add to the appearance of credibility. And there are other tactics, but ultimately, these operations give themselves away by gradually shifting away from covering provable fact and misdirecting people to nebulous areas of speculation, fantastic wild claims, and unfounded, fictional topics.
For those who still don’t get it:
Tea kettles don’t explode because they have a whistle on them that blows off steam when the temperature of the water rises. Got it? So the alphabet soup agencies put “social control valves” of various kinds on the societal tea kettle (think of the U.S. Army’s 1964 ‘Project Camelot’ study) so that when society begins to get upset at the rampant, malignant corruption in government, the societal tea kettle simply blows off steam through the “whistle” thingy instead of exploding in social unrest and a popular uprising.
So, the “whistle blower” gambit may deflect people’s attention from more serious matters by rendering people into passive observers of dramas that others stage for them to observe, as opposed to concretely, personally organizing their own direct social activity in policy areas that concern them. That is what, of course, the alphabet soup agencies absolutely do not want, because then people are no longer their passive, unquestioningly obedient, ignorant, compliant, dumbed-down, 1040 revenue-producing slave units.
Thanks to Queenyinthehouse
Duration : 0:14:34
Officer Louis Morris Stillwater Police Rape Sex Teen Age Girl
http://policecrimes.com/forum/ Officer Morris was sentenced to ONLY 1 year in the county jail and given a 10-year suspended sentence.
Forty-nine-year-old officer Louis Morris pleaded guilty to three counts of lewd acts with a child under 16 and two counts of rape by instrumentation.
Police videos police brutality sheriff police department sex abuse Rape sex Teen Age Girl Caught on Video cop
Duration : 0:2:4
Alex Jones – TSA Groping Out Of Control 1_3!
Everything you need to know about the security takeover and why airport oppression is already being rolled out on the streets
TSA abuse in airports is completely out of control with more and more cases of security workers groping women, fondling children, abusing naked body scanners, and interrogating passengers emerging every week, and yet the government’s answer to the epidemic of oppression is to hand TSA thugs more power with which to harass American citizens.
The story of Infowars employee Michelle, who along with her child was sexually assaulted by TSA staff after refusing to go through a naked body scanner, has gone viral on the Internet after it was picked up by the Drudge Report, a website leading the charge in the backlash against airport oppression at the hands of the TSA that has now led to the world’s largest pilot’s association boycotting the use of naked body scanners.
Michelle’s traumatic experience represents just the tip of the iceberg.
The launch of naked body scanners, which were hastily installed in the wake of the Christmas Day bombing attempt despite the fact that they would not have stopped the attack, has only worsened the levels of abuse dished out to passengers.
The body scanners were vigorously promoted by people like former Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff and others who stood to reap a financial windfall from their implementation, despite the fact that scientists at Columbia University and the Inter-Agency Committee on Radiation Safety, along with other scientific bodies, have all warned that the devices increase the risk of developing cancer.
Stories about TSA officials abusing the use of the scanners have become commonplace.
44-year-old Rolando Negrin beat his supervisor with a police baton after he had cracked jokes about Negrin’s small manhood when he walked through a naked scanner as part of a training exercise at Miami International Airport. The story underscored the fact that authorities had been lying all along about the claim that the scanners did not show sensitive details of genitalia.
The aggressive campaign on behalf of governments and the media to sell the public on invasive body scanners has been accompanied by the reassurance that the devices do not show details of genitals, an obvious attempt to counter the fact that the machines represent a virtual strip search as well as violating laws against child pornography.
Despite assurances from the TSA that the scanners do not show the shape of genitalia, sample images from their own website clearly display the outline of the penis. In addition, after nearly a year of authorities lying in claiming that the technology used in airports did not allow the naked images to be saved or transmitted, it emerged that police agencies, including the U.S. Marshals Service, who were using the same systems, were storing naked body scanner images. The TSA’s own documents also confirmed that the machines must “allow exporting of image data in real time” and provide a mechanism for “high-speed transfer of image data over the network.”
Indian film star Shahrukh Khan told a BBC talk show that naked images of his body from the scanner were printed out and circulated by airport staff at Heathrow in London. Heathrow denied the claim but Khan himself never retracted the story, and had no apparent motive for making it up.
Heathrow authorities were unable to deny a later example of the scanners being abused, when it emerged that a Heathrow worker had perved over a naked image of a female colleague after she passed through one of the devices, before commenting, “I love those gigantic tits”.
Jo Margetson, 29, reported John Laker, 25, to the police after she had entered the x-ray machine by mistake and Laker took the image before making lewd comments.
Airport security staff workers are among the least trustworthy people to operate these machines. These individuals are routinely caught abusing their authority for their own ego trip or sexual perversion.
As the video below illustrates, the fact that naked body scanner machines in the U.S. are manned by TSA thugs who are routinely caught abusing their power in treating the public like prison inmates only heightens the danger posed by the use of the new devices.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/
http://www.infowars.com/
http://www.infowarsshop.com/
Duration : 0:14:51
Police Officers Little Rock Bashing Cuffed Man Into Window
http://policecrimes.com/forum/ Police officer Videos police brutality jobs sheriff department security cops crimes misconduct law enforcement deputy Police Officers Little Rock Bashing Cuffed Man Into Window
Duration : 0:1:20
